Keystone And The Long Fight

I would recommend reading a recent piece by David Roberts on Grist.  Mr. Roberts takes on critics who say that the environmental movement's focus on the Keystone XL pipeline is "unreasonable".  Although I have worried that the White House may consider Keystone as an easy escape from taking other bold positions to cut fossil fuels and protecting wildlands -- reject Keystone but then compromise on other fossil fuel policies -- I think Mr. Roberts lays out an excellent case for why we have to stake out bold positions, even if it means earning an "unreasonable" label. 

Our wildlands face a serious threat from climate change and continued human destruction.  This calls for "rapid, systemic change," as Mr. Roberts highlights.  This has its own special relevance in the desert -- beyond the need to cut fossil fuels and stem climate change impacts, we also need to demand more from the renewable energy industry.  We need to keep large-scale projects away from pristine desert habitat, and push for the aggressive deployment of distributed solar generation in our cities or on already-disturbed lands.  The most sustainable path probably is not the easiest path, but it will have the least regrets (unless you are a utility company executive!).

Rooftop solar panels adorn a building at the visitor center for the Desert National Wildlife Refuge in Nevada.


Popular posts from this blog

Green Groups Silent as Solar Company Plans Destruction of Mojave Wildlands

Trump Proposes Fracking in Western Mojave

Desert Wildlands Need Your Voice in Vegas